
"Saddle
Stock"
A
heavily crowded boulevard of stallions and mares
Canter
into a theatre hall where The Hoarse Whisperer
plays.
Anticipation
reigns within the round steeple proscenium
As
they gossip and gait for an evening of fun.
Horse
lights fade to black, commanding udder silence:
The
playing space beams with engaging brightness
And
soon a magical menagerie treads upon the stage
Engulfed
in a fantastic cloud of smoky blue sage.
Yellow
frogs croak Mozart to strings of green giraffes,
Massive
fleas dance baroquely around a miniscule elephant masse,
Timid
lions squeak Keats beneath poetic roars of courageous mice,
And
monkeys recite Shakespearean soliloquies to gaggles of critical geese.
Oh
such spectacle defies all laws of physics,
Dispels
most notions of Olympian gymnastics…
The
sequence of events leads to an exalted bridle shower,
Proving
that live performance still carries thoroughbred power.
The
cast bows gallantly to thunderous stomping hooves,
Neighs
and whinnies confirm the show was in the groove:
Electric
as fiery pine needles on a crisp autumn night;
The
sparks still simmer after the curtain’s final plight.
So
as an encore they perform Death of a Horseman:
A
dark tale about a Jockey who gets trampled in England—
Starring
Laryngitis, a leather-clad hunger-stricken mule
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Malodorous
Stench!
Today
thy fierce stench seems less potent,
It
usually rivals an elephant’s ass!
People
who catch wind of it feel it’s important
To
remain polite, and discuss rap or jazz;
Truthfully
thy odor has knocked over trees...
Timber!
Lumber’s largest limbo in June.
Rotten
blue salmon eggs, ten-year-old peas,
And
rainbow trout vomit—all nicer fumes!
When
out in public, please atomize thy pits
Or
sour notes on my guitar I shall devise.
I’d
hate to be near thee when ye hast the shits,
Perhaps
it’d do you to wear a disguise.
Farewell
foul odor and all who polluted,
For now this sonnet’s smell has concluded.
All this hot talk has awakened my appetite. It was sleeping. It has become narcoleptic of late.
Such a voracious appetite as mine is too often curbed by the likes of society at large. The majority
tends to rule according to Hoyle. Who the hell Hoyle is remains a mystery, but it has been said
on many occasions by many wise earthlings that the world is run by "C" students and governed
by dirty money. Actually I concocted that little anecdote myself, but the universal credit seems right.
When in question ye may also look verily to the Bard, for according to the adulated 16th Century
playwright William Wigglestick: “the ignorance of many outweighs the comprehension of the few.”
And so mediocrity prevails. It runs rampant on the sidewalks of life. It’s everywhere, in plain view.
On the roads, in the sky, within the oceans, and beneath the very soil upon which we tread daily.
Brilliance goes misunderstood, frequently cast aside, impatiently labeled as inaccessible rather
than evolved, pushed into a corner and shunned rather than being celebrated and widely displayed.
Many brilliant artistic people in particular are investigated and studied to the point of enlightenment
only after they have perished!
How can this be? Did someone create a manuscript on
this subject to justify such backward
thinking? Or is there a misgiving about the artist’s reaction to being acknowledged for genius?
Perhaps the admission of it will somehow interfere with the creation of more brilliant works? Bullshit.
Granted, it's a fine line, as it's also easy to fall into the trap of unfairly expecting greatness from an
individual or a group who has delivered it before. There enters the element of pressure -- one of
life's challenging tests that takes years of discipline to master, for who’s to say what’s artistic
ingenuity and what’s lackadaisical dreck anyhow? Is something more outstanding if the masses
love it, or moreso if it's cherished by a minority? Seemingly this has more to do with the content's
accessibility on a broad level versus content that is understood by a select few.
Regardless, the individual creator of an art form, whatever it may be, determines its basis.
And to all who aspire to conjure whatever Muse moves them to express their innermost wantons,
latent surges and visions, my advice begins and ends with these words: dare to be a pioneer. There
are plenty of unclimbed trees. There is much to be discovered even though we have explored vastly.
Until we are utilizing most of our brain capacity, we have only begun to embark upon the journey
of humanity. So, may you scale a great pine, inhale deeply from its swinging tip, and release a
masterful cacophony of sound!
In the Millennial turnover, an era I fondly call The Age of Too Much Information, people have
become overwhelmed by literally hundreds of television channels and bombarded with mainstream
movies, of which a handful stand up as respectable films. Bug-eyed in the electronic age of pop-up
internet ads and streaming video horseshit, who knows where to go or what to watch or when to
just shut everything off and retire to a warm bath and a book of some sort? The reading and
comprehension levels have plummetted over the past few decades, clearly illustrated by ignorance
and sub-standard levels of communication.
It's all informed, literate people can do to encourage
these basic tools in others by example.
That being writ, the entertainment realm has become saturated by homogenized blueprints of
what might have been worthwhile projects at origin. Yet they lose merit along the pathway of business,
as some of those able to back creative endeavors have less artistic credibility than they'd care to
acknowledge. Ideally, we could learn from this and adopt a new mandate of quality before quantity,
the ideal being a steady quantity of quality. First and foremost, leave the artistic vision in the grasp
of the artistic people. It’s a dismal shame that the entertainment industry is run by executives
rather than by artists. From my seat it seems that most corporate aficionados determine what project
will go public based on flow charts, statistics, and marketability. Using math as a compass for art in
this way is contrived, and it shows in the lack of genuinely novel products shoved at us by advertisers.
The main reason ads are turned down in the first place is that the audience ain't buyin' what's bein' sold
to 'em. By this logic, it’s a miracle when a project of any kind attains a viable position in the industry
and also manages to retain a degree of artistic integrity because the visionaries have at some point or
another had to learn how to speak about creativity with bankers and credit unions!